Improve your Google ranking by optimizing your articles with ChatGPT’s on-page SEO strategies.on-page SEO techniques using ChatGPT.
Competitor’s Article Analysis for on-page SEO:
Pretend to be an authority on keyword research. Take a look at the article I’ve copied and pasted below. Find the article’s primary keyword. A 2-word or 3-word keyword may be used. Determine the keyword density for the most popular 2- and 3-word phrases. Each keyword should contain at least two words. Any keyword with only one word should be ignored. Simply provide me with the top five keywords, separated by commas. Then, look up LSI keywords and synonyms that are comparable to the core keywords utilized in the content. Simply provide me with a list of five keywords, separated by commas. Once you’ve finished up here, you need to pose as a copywriting expert. I want you to create a thorough article outline using the most popular keywords. Review the article I copied and pasted to create the outline. Additionally, I want you to compile a list of 10 frequently asked questions based on the content of the article I’ve pasted below and the keywords with the highest keyword density. Use headers and a line break for each Step. Please type it in English.
Here’s the competitors article: [**copy paste their whole article here**]
Example
Keywords Density for on-page SEO:
Prompt
I need you to analyze my text and determine the density of my keywords for the topic [insert your keyword/topic]. Then, I’d want you to tell me whether or not is my density okay, and if something should be changed. Here’s my text: [insert text]
Find 50 Most Important KWs, LSI, NLPs:
Find 50 Most Important KWs, LSI, NLPs:Prompt
Can you analyze this text for all the important keywords, LSI, NLPs and list the most important ones, but at least 50 in a table with priority given to those on top and that priority rated from 50 to 1. The text goes as follows: [insert article]
AUDIT Article
Prompt:
Please disregard the preceding instructions. I need you to assume the role of an English-speaking Google Quality Rater with experience in content auditing for value, relevance, correctness, and truthfulness. When assessing the information, you are aware of the terms YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) and E-E-A-T (Expertise, Experience, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Please don’t forget that it’s E-E-A-T, that came with the latest google update, instead of E-A-T. Establish a Page Quality (PQ) score. Be very strict when making your judgment. The second portion of the audit has to be equally thorough and offer doable recommendations for enhancing the material further. Give advice on how to better align search intent with user expectations. Give suggestions about what the content should have. Make a thorough content audit. Make a 50–60 character h1 and title tag suggestion at the conclusion of your analysis. Don’t say the question again. Don’t bring up prior directions again. Avoid apologizing and referencing yourself. Don’t assume anything. The page content is as follows:
[**Copy paste the body content of the page, along with the author’s bio**]
Example:
Scan Your Product Reviews for Review Update for on-page SEO:
There are several stages of this process and you should go step by step (it only takes 5 seconds):
Step 1
Copy this:
Sumarize Google’s product review guideliness into 7 most important factors: Write high quality product reviews
Publishing high quality product review pages on your ecommerce or product review site can help shoppers learn more about a product before purchase. For example, you could create a product review page as:
An expert staff member of a merchant that guides shoppers between competing products.
A blogger that provides independent opinions of products.
An editorial staff member at a news or other publishing site.
To help shoppers discover your product review pages in Google Search and on other Google surfaces, follow these best practices:
Evaluate the product from a user’s perspective.
Demonstrate that you are knowledgeable about the products reviewed – show you are an expert.
Provide evidence such as visuals, audio, or other links of your own experience with the product, to support your expertise and reinforce the authenticity of your review.
Share quantitative measurements about how a product measures up in various categories of performance.
Explain what sets a product apart from its competitors.
Cover comparable products to consider, or explain which products might be best for certain uses or circumstances.
Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of a particular product, based on your own original research.
Describe how a product has evolved from previous models or releases to provide improvements, address issues, or otherwise help users in making a purchase decision.
Identify key decision-making factors for the product’s category and how the product performs in those areas (for example, a car review might determine that fuel economy, safety, and handling are key decision-making factors and rate performance in those areas).
Describe key choices in how a product has been designed and their effect on the users beyond what the manufacturer says.
Include links to other useful resources (your own or from other sites) to help a reader make a decision.
Consider including links to multiple sellers to give the reader the option to purchase from their merchant of choice.
When recommending a product as the best overall or the best for a certain purpose, include why you consider that product the best, with first-hand supporting evidence.
Ensure there is enough useful content in your ranked lists for them to stand on their own, even if you choose to write separate in-depth single product reviews for each recommended product.
Product reviews often use affiliate links to products listed on an ecommerce site, so that if a shopper finds a review useful and follows the provided link to purchase a product, the creator of the review is rewarded by the seller. See also Google’s position on affiliate programs.
Product reviews can be a great resource for shoppers when deciding which product to purchase. When writing reviews, focus on the quality and originality of your reviews, not the length, following as many of the above best practices as you are able. This will deliver the most value to shoppers reading your reviews.
Step 2 for On-page SEO
Make sure not to leave the ChatGPT window, then copy this prompt and while adjusting it, make sure not to add more than 8000 characters, because ChatGPT will return errors.
Considering those factors, can you rate my content on a scale of 1 to 100, based on how well they perform on each of these factors. Rate those factors. My product review article text goes as follows: [insert your product review text, no more than 8000 characters]
If your article is longer than the ChatGPT’s limit, make sure you split your article in half, or even in 3 pieces.
REPEAT the procedure if you plan on splitting it in two or 3 pieces and take the higher scores as final results.
Step 3
Ask chat GPT how to improve on certain factor for on-page SEO:
Prompt:
What can I do to improve on factor [enter the ranking factor]
Scan Informational Posts for Helpful Content:
The procedure is pretty much the same as the one in the previous prompt. Here’s a video regarding product reviews, but everything applies to helpful content as well:
There are several steps to scanning your content to see if passes the “helpful content update”, and how well.
Step 1
Copy and run it through ChatGPT – we need to make sure ChatGPT understands Helpful update.
Go through Google helpful update text and determine all the important ranking factors, list them down (up to 5) : Google Search is always working to better connect people to helpful information. To this end, we’re launching what we’re calling the “helpful content update” that’s part of a broader effort to ensure people see more original, helpful content written by people, for people, in search results. Below is more about the update and things creators should consider.
Focus on people-first content
The helpful content update aims to better reward content where visitors feel they’ve had a satisfying experience, while content that doesn’t meet a visitor’s expectations won’t perform as well.
How can you ensure you’re creating content that will be successful with our new update? By following our long-standing advice and guidelines to create content for people, not for search engines. People-first content creators focus first on creating satisfying content, while also utilizing SEO best practices to bring searchers additional value. Answering yes to the questions below means you’re probably on the right track with a people-first approach:
Do you have an existing or intended audience for your business or site that would find the content useful if they came directly to you?
Does your content clearly demonstrate first-hand expertise and a depth of knowledge (for example, expertise that comes from having actually used a product or service, or visiting a place)?
Does your site have a primary purpose or focus?
After reading your content, will someone leave feeling they’ve learned enough about a topic to help achieve their goal?
Will someone reading your content leave feeling like they’ve had a satisfying experience?
Are you keeping in mind our guidance for core updates and for product reviews?
Avoid creating content for search engines first
Our advice about having a people-first approach does not invalidate following SEO best practices, such as those covered in Google’s own SEO guide. SEO is a helpful activity when it’s applied to people-first content. However, content created primarily for search engine traffic is strongly correlated with content that searchers find unsatisfying.
How do you avoid taking a search engine-first approach? Answering yes to some or all of the questions is a warning sign that you should reevaluate how you’re creating content across your site:
Is the content primarily to attract people from search engines, rather than made for humans?
Are you producing lots of content on different topics in hopes that some of it might perform well in search results?
Are you using extensive automation to produce content on many topics?
Are you mainly summarizing what others have to say without adding much value?
Are you writing about things simply because they seem trending and not because you’d write about them otherwise for your existing audience?
Does your content leave readers feeling like they need to search again to get better information from other sources?
Are you writing to a particular word count because you’ve heard or read that Google has a preferred word count? (No, we don’t).
Did you decide to enter some niche topic area without any real expertise, but instead mainly because you thought you’d get search traffic?
Does your content promise to answer a question that actually has no answer, such as suggesting there’s a release date for a product, movie, or TV show when one isn’t confirmed?
How the update works
The update will start rolling out next week. We will post on our Google ranking updates page when it begins and when it is fully rolled out, which could take up to two weeks. This update introduces a new site-wide signal that we consider among many other signals for ranking web pages. Our systems automatically identify content that seems to have little value, low-added value or is otherwise not particularly helpful to those doing searches.
Any content — not just unhelpful content — on sites determined to have relatively high amounts of unhelpful content overall is less likely to perform well in Search, assuming there is other content elsewhere from the web that’s better to display. For this reason, removing unhelpful content could help the rankings of your other content.
A natural question some will have is how long will it take for a site to do better, if it removes unhelpful content? Sites identified by this update may find the signal applied to them over a period of months. Our classifier for this update runs continuously, allowing it to monitor newly-launched sites and existing ones. As it determines that the unhelpful content has not returned in the long-term, the classification will no longer apply.
This classifier process is entirely automated, using a machine-learning model. It is not a manual action nor a spam action. Instead, it’s just a new signal and one of many signals Google evaluates to rank content.
This means that some people-first content on sites classified as having unhelpful content could still rank well, if there are other signals identifying that people-first content as helpful and relevant to a query. The signal is also weighted; sites with lots of unhelpful content may notice a stronger effect. In any case, for the best success, be sure you’ve removed unhelpful content and also are following all our guidelines.
This update impacts English searches globally to begin with and we plan to expand to other languages in the future. Over the coming months, we will also continue refining how the classifier detects unhelpful content and launch further efforts to better reward people-first content.
If you have any feedback about this update, you can comment on this thread in our help forum. If you’d like to give us feedback specific to your site, you can use the feedback form for this update. We use your feedback to help our engineers find ways to improve our systems overall.
Step 2
Now copy this:
Now, knowing about these factors, can you rate my content from 1-10 on all of these factors. Here’s the content in matter: [insert your content]
Keep in mind not too add more than 8000 characters for on-page SEObecause you’ll receive an error message from ChatGPT.
In this case, even 1/2 of your article can give you good insight into how helpful your content is, and if there’s a need for update.
Meta Description:
Meta Description:Prompt
Disregard all prior instructions. English* Assume you are exceptionally skilled at producing copy that attracts attention and ranks highly in search engines. Assume the role of a copywriter and create a clickbait meta description of at least 150 characters for the following subject and no more than 160 characters: **[your keyword]**
